A Theoretical Analysis of Inner Art and Its Role in the Process of Human Creativity
Abstract
In recent years, increasing attention has been paid to the inner dimensions of the human being in explaining the process of artistic creativity; nevertheless, the role of mental, emotional, imaginative, and unconscious experiences in many prevailing theories of art remains fragmented and lacks a coherent conceptual framework. The main concern of this study is to conceptualize the notion of “inner art” and to examine its role in the process of artistic creation. Adopting an analytical–theoretical approach and drawing on perspectives from the philosophy of art, the psychology of creativity, and aesthetic theories, the present research seeks to rethink the relationship between the human inner realm and artistic expression. Within this framework, inner art is defined as a dynamic and multilayered domain of mental, emotional, imaginative, and unconscious experiences that takes shape within the artist before the external manifestation of the artwork and, through continuous interaction with external realities, determines the direction, meaning, and identity of the work. The findings indicate that the creative process is not merely a reaction to external stimuli, but rather the outcome of a complex dialogue between the artist’s inner world and cultural, social, and material contexts. The article argues that recognizing inner art can lead to a more comprehensive understanding of human creativity, a redefinition of the role of subjectivity in art theory, and the development of innovative approaches to art education—approaches that emphasize the cultivation of inner awareness, imagination, and lived experience alongside the teaching of technical skills.
Keywords:
Inner art, Artistic creativity, Inner realm, Philosophy of art, Psychology of creativity, Art educationReferences
- [1] Woodruff, P., & Nehamas, A. (Eds) (1989). Symposium. Hackett publishing company. https://books.google.com/books/about/Symposium.html?id=-mn9DAAAQBAJ
- [2] Heath, M. (Ed) (1997). Poetics (Penguin classics). Penguin classics. https://www.amazon.com/Poetics-Penguin-Classics-Aristotle/dp/0140446362
- [3] Guyer, P., & Matthews, E. (Eds) (2000). Critique of the power of judgment. Cambridge university press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804656
- [4] Hegel, G. W. F. (1998). Aesthetics: Lectures on fine art (Vol. 2). Oxford university press. https://philpapers.org/rec/WFHALO
- [5] Freud, S. (1908). Creative writers and day-dreaming. The standard edition. http://users.uoa.gr/~cdokou/FreudCreativeWriters.pdf
- [6] Jung, C. G. (2012). Man and his symbols. Bantam. https://antilogicalism.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/man-and-his-symbols.pdf
- [7] Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. McGraw-Hill. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1967-35015-000
- [8] Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. HarperPerennial. https://www.amazon.com/Creativity-Flow-Psychology-Discovery-Invention/dp/0062283251
- [9] Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: An introduction to phenomenological philosophy. Northwestern University Press. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=Ca7GDwz5lF4C&oi=fnd&pg=PR15&dq=Husserl,+E.+(1970)
- [10] Merleau Ponty, M. (1964). The primacy of perception. Northwestern university press. https://voidnetwork.gr/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/The-primacy-of-perception-by-Maurice-Merleau-Ponty..pdf
- [11] Zamiri, C., & Seyed Ahmadi Zaviyeh, S. S. (2025). Identifying the effective components in the evaluation and development of artistic creativity. Scientific journal of pazhuhesh-e honar, 15(29), 1-19. (In Persian). http://dx.doi.org/ 10.52547/ph.15.29.1
- [12] Ahmadi, B. (2020). Truth and beauty (Lessons in the philosophy of art). Publications center. (In Persian). https://www.iranketab.ir/book/19395-truth-and-beauty
- [13] Macann, C. (2005). Four phenomenological philosophers: Husserl, heidegger, sartre, merleau-ponty. Routledge. https://books.google.com/books/about/Four_Phenomenological_Philosophers.html?id=4gPADkDiVf0C
- [14] Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American psychologist, 5(9), 444–454. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0063487
- [15] Carritt, E. F. (1938). The principles of art. By RG collingwood. Philosophy, 13(52), 492–496. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/philosophy/article/abs/principles-of-art-by-rg-collingwood-oxford-at-the-clarendon-press-london-humphrey-milford-1938-pp-xi-347-price-15s/DCB93F44F9830C096BAF7AB2A222B677
- [16] Plato. (1989). Ion. Hackett publishing company. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1216085.Ion
- [17] Schelling, F. W. J. (1856). Friedrich wilhelm joseph schelling. Sämmtliche werke. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/317337.System_of_Transcendental_Idealism
- [18] Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity research journal, 24(1), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
- [19] Rolling Jr, J. (2006). The arts and the creation of mind. Journal of curriculum studies, 38, 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270500122604